There are few industries and domains of the medical community that derives as much scrutiny as a local pregnancy termination clinic in Australia.
Aside from the anti-vaccination movement that has gained traction, this is a topic that incites a number of emotions and opinions.
Whether they are based on religious grounds or from a moral standpoint, there are false arguments and misconceptions that come with this territory.
Here we will outline key facts about local facilities who provide reproductive healthcare services for women, removing any falsehoods that emerge over the course of the abortion debate.
“The Law Is Settled On Abortion”
This first misconception is easily the most complex to begin the discussion. For good and bad, the law is not entirely settled when it comes to the role that a pregnancy termination clinic plays for communities. Whilst it is a legal practice in Victoria and other states and territories, it is only provisional in regions like Queensland and South Australia where there are stricter limits depending on the length of the trimester.
Then there is New South Wales, a state who continues to adhere to an archaic stance that the practice is illegal. Fortunately a doctor can make exceptions when they believe there is any physical, mental or social difficulties that would occur during and after birth. To say that the law is settled from a pro or anti-choice stance within the context of Australia would be inaccurate, as there is advocacy groups hoping to influence future legislation in the coming years.
“Pregnancy Termination Is The Only Role These Practices Play”
A pregnancy termination clinic clearly has a role to play when an abortion is to be carried out, but there are many other factors and roles that are included as part of the process. Gynaecologists are tasked with catering to a variety of reproductive health concerns and will engage a myriad of tests before offering educational material and support for the woman.
“Women Are Pressured Into Making a Decision”
The bottom line is that women are not pressured into a decision when they make an appointment for a pregnancy termination clinic. Especially within the first trimester between weeks 1 and 12 of a pregnancy, these matters can be handled discretely and quickly for ultimate convenience. They can also be handled simply within the second trimester between weeks 13 and 27, but there can be legal complications in Australia late into trimester two. It is only during trimester three from week 28 onwards where a definitive decision has to be made, a choice that can have serious implications for the health of the mother.
“Facilities Are Pro-Abortion”
Gynaecologists are professional operators who make determinations based on medical evidence. Those who visit a pregnancy termination clinic are supported by that same level of experience and expertise. To suggest that there is a predisposed agenda is to make baseless conspiracies on the subject without any actual evidence.
“They Aren’t Safe Environments For Women”
There is a belief from good and bad faith actors alike that women who participate with a pregnancy termination clinic are placing their health and safety in danger. The fact remains that barely a handful of women who receive treatments in this setting have ever experienced complications. There is no medical evidence either to support the theory that women cannot conceive once they have received an abortion. These environments are as safe as any other medical field, despite claims to the contrary.
There will be individuals and groups who simply do not agree with a woman’s right to choose. Those opinions should never tarnish the work that a local pregnancy termination clinic carries out, looking out for the health and safety of women placed in the most of unenviable of situations when facing an unplanned pregnancy.…
Environmental management is a consistent practice for the company to remain aware of the relationships that its products, processes, and operations have with the environment, as well as to continually improve environmental performance. Environmental management standards seek to provide organizations with components of a system capable of integrating with other requirements of a management process to achieve ecological and economic goals, as well as the adequate compliance with Brazilian environmental laws.
In order to comply with this definition, companies must follow strict environmental laws, as there are many ways to evaluate the Quality of treatment of effluents or solid waste, and that there are ecological agencies responsible for assessing compliance with such Brazilian environmental laws as CETESB in the State of São Paulo, or CONAMA (National Council for the Environment), which provides for the National Environmental Policy with the objective of standardizing and evaluating the articles of Law.
This body was responsible for presenting Law No. 12,305 / 10, which establishes the National Solid Waste Policy (PNRS), which is appropriate to the current context of recycling procedures, such as effluent treatment, and contains essential tools to allow the necessary advance to Brazil in addressing the leading environmental, social and economic problems arising from the inadequate management of solid wastes.
This environmental Law establishes the prevention and reduction of waste generation, both in macro and microeconomic aspects such as the treatment of industrial effluents. I am having as a proposal the practice of sustainable consumption habits and a set of instruments to promote the increase of recycling and reuse of solid wastes (what has economic value and can be recycled or reused) and the environmentally adequate disposal of wastes (what cannot be recycled or reused). It also establishes the shared responsibility of waste generators: from manufacturers, importers, distributors, traders and owners of municipal reliable waste management services, in Reverse Logistics of waste and posts consumer packaging.
In addition to creating important goals that will contribute to the elimination of landfills, the PNRS establishes waste management planning instruments at the national, state, and municipal levels. Placing Brazil on an equal footing with the leading developed countries regarding the legal framework, and bringing the inclusion for collectors and collectors of recyclable and reusable materials, both in Reverse Logistics and in Selective Collection.
In addition to the legislative perspectives, there are specific normative aspects for the management of the business with environmental management, which generates mandatory certifications for action. These standards are set by the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT). One relates to the Quality Management System, the other to the Environmental Management System.
The first concerns the Quality of operations. ISO 9001 was elaborated by the Quality Management and Quality Assurance (ISO / TC 176) Technical Committee, document resulting from the revision published by ABNT, the version being ISO 9001, 2008. It is the standard that certifies Quality and defines the requirements for the implementation of the system. This document has standardization tools and is a safe model for the implementation of Quality Management.
The purpose of the standard is to bring confidence to the customer that the company’s products and services will be created repetitively and consistently so that it acquires the Quality defined by the company. When the company certifies itself in this standard, it will be able to use a high quality tool: the PDCA Cycle (Plan-Do-Check-Action), which means to plan, do, check, and act.